nanothermite?
-
Why are are stats showing many hits for “Christopher Hitchens,” none for “nanothermite?”
The banner displayed prominently at the top of my website says, “nanothermite?” The second subheading, after “Home,” is “nanothermite?”
I stood in front of the Massachusetts state house for the entire day of 9/11/14, holding a five-foot plywood sign that also said, incidentally, “nanothermite?” and handed out leaflets directing people to my blog. That day, if the stats are to be trusted, Christopher Hitchens received several hundred views. Nanothermite received only two.
What gives? Are visitors being misdirected to the Christopher Hitchens page when they click on “nanothermite?’ or are the stats inaccurate.
I cannot believe that a page as obscure as the Christopher Hitchens page on my blog would so greatly outpace “nanothermite?”
Thank you for your help.
The blog I need help with is: (visible only to logged in users)
-
Here is what Google has indexed for your site site:unitedresistance911.wordpress.com/
Here is what a Goggle search for “nanoathermite” produces
Here is is what a Google search for nonothermite on your site URL produces nanothermite site:unitedresistance911.wordpress.com/
Here is what a Google search for Christopher Hitchens on your site URL produces
Perhaps Christopher Hitchens is be a more popular search term than nanothermite is.
-
Sorry about the typo above nonothermite = nanothermite. Luckily, I typed it into Google correctly.
-
Why, on September 11, when I stood for an entire day in front of the Massachusetts statehouse with a five-foot plywood “nanothermite?” sign, would Christopher Hitchens receive a sudden spike in views?
Google has little to do with the views this page receives. As I stated in the original message, I employ other means to attract readers. (leaflets and pamphlets that direct people to http://www.unitedresistance911.wordpress.com)
-
I tagged this thread for Staff assistance. Please subscribe to it so you are notified when they respond. To subscribe:
1. Look in the sidebar of this thread and find the subscribe to topics link.
2. Look below the comment box:
_ Notify me of followup posts via e-mail -
Elizabeth Woodworth wrote an interesting article earlier this year on the topic of search engine manipulation.
an excerpt from this piece:
“On September 8, 2013, the popular Russia Today “Truthseeker” program, with over a million subscribers on YouTube,[1] published a 13-minute newscast entitled “The Truthseeker: 9/11 and Operation Gladio (E23).”Below the video frame ran the caption:
Bigger than Watergate’: US ‘regular’ meetings with Al-Qaeda’s leader; documented White House ‘false flag terrorism’ moving people ‘like sheep’; the father of Twin Towers victim tell us why he backs this month’s 9/11 campaign on Times Square and around the world; & the protests calendar for September.
This paragraph was followed by a list of interviewees, including four people representing three scholarly research organizations: Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth,[2] the 9/11 Consensus Panel,[3] and The Journal of 9/11 Studies.[4]
The “Truthseeker” video immediately started to gain popularity on YouTube, reaching 131,000 views in the first three days.[5](The history of the viewing statistics may be seen by clicking on the little graphic symbol under the video frame, and to the right)
Truthseeker posted its program to YouTube on Sept. 8. Russia Today tweeted the YouTube link to its 546,000 followers and to the interviewer, Daniel Bushell, that day:
RT @RT_com 8 Sep
The Truthseeker: 9/11 and operation Gladio (E23) http://youtu.be/vka7Da6e9LY @DanielBushellRT
A MOXNEWS copy of the same newscast was also posted September 8 under the title “Russia Today News Declares 9/11 An Inside Job False Flag Attack!” which in turn started to escalate, with over 80,000 views in the first few days.[6]
Other uploads of the program also appeared, with less traffic, bringing the early viewing total to over a quarter of a million people.
What Happened Next?
In both the RT and MOXNEWS cases, the viewer statistics on YouTube suddenly flat-lined on the morning of September 11 — like a heart monitor when a patient dies.
The YouTube search engine had suddenly failed to locate these videos.
Oddly, although the RT video may still be viewed on YouTube through its direct link (if known) from the Google URL box,[7] it cannot be accessed on YouTube by its title, or by portions of its title, or by searching “Truthseeker.”
The MOXNET version was also decoupled from the YouTube search engine for a period of time after September 11, but has since been restored to normal indexing.”
I have come to believe that my communications are subject to similar disruption.
-
Hi Marley,
I can only speak of the stats you are seeing on WordPress.com. I took a look into your stats and everything looks to be normal. I’m not seeing any kind of strange activity.
What gives? Are visitors being misdirected to the Christopher Hitchens page when they click on “nanothermite?’ or are the stats inaccurate.
Visitors are not being misdirected on your site. I’m not sure why Christopher Hitchens is one of the more popular pages on your site. @timethief took a stab at why this may seen to be the case. Her reasoning that Christopher Hitchens is more popular on Google, is probably a good reason why.
If you want to direct people to your nanothermite page, you may want to give the direct link to that page:
http://unitedresistance911.wordpress.com/nanothermite/
Cheers!
- The topic ‘nanothermite?’ is closed to new replies.
WordPress.com Forums 