www.vindicating michael
-
Why did my comment not get displayed. I had a valid e-mail(you even mailed to congratulate me, “you are in”. I get mail from several medical sites,NYTimes etc. and am not interested in more sites and mail. I can find what interests me by my self and dont want themes in blocks as you present them.Do not constantly ask for new passwords.And you never sent any code to my phone. It has been successful with other US sites.Kindly send code to my e-mail-.
The blog I need help with is: (visible only to logged in users)
-
-
I don´t want to start a blog. But great that the irrational behaviour on yor part is seen.After I have,on your request, changed password and then relogged for the x nr of times,which I dilgently did, you send a congratulation to my e-mail :Worldpress:You are in!.Then follows a great amount of squares which you are supposed to mark mirroring your supposed aereas of interest. I prefer to chose those by myself rather than being presented such in a package.Other to me unknown figurations turn up with complicated to me descriptions of their meaning.My only humble question is that I be given back the opportunity to post on the blog http://www.vindicating michael.Why do you have to make it practically impossible? -I know that other people have had problems too.Someone was able to post on abovementioned blog after he signed in every time. I have had a permalink for nearly 4 years.
I hope I can put an end to this problem.Meanwhile others who have expierienced something similar ,please share your knowledde and tell me if you happened to get in posting on VMJ. -
And worldpress be kind enough to explain how all this happened. My best regards to Helena and all others.Your sites, wp,are very confusing. See,I looked for something simple and now I have started a blog which was not my intention.
I do have one thing and another to say about the AEG trial and the verdict.There was this what seems to have been “the forbidden word”.
not even the judge mentioned it and none of the jurors,supposedly sane adults, had any logical discussion about it.Strange. Ethics is at the core of a doctor-patinent relationship.A medical student would have been better than Murray. At least he/she at least knows when to ask for help.It was a trial that ended after the first question.Does the judge see unethical doctors?-50 hrs of listening to those who did not remember,then the sc hysterics who were heard, and inbetween various financial specialists as well as the medical ones.Dr. Czeltric made the best imperssion.A 5 month trial with no rational end How come? After all those 50 weeks the jurors must have been exhausted. So then they were treated to the movie TII and a relaxing lunch. They would have deserved a siesta too. But the ambiance was good, why destroy it with more tiring intellectual exercises.Michael was so symphatetic too that some became fans.He did at least deserve hat when justice was denied.The trial ended before it really started.
It was impossible to say no to the first question, but then it got stuck.
I prefer to be part of a blog and hear other peoples observations and opinions to this unrequested blog. -
I don´t know how to respond to me. You can try http://www.vindicating michael. I will chech there after some time.I will also describe how doctors usually are interviewed and checked out before employment.
-
Who are you talking to? I’m scared at the thought of you deciding which doctors should be employed and which ones should not.
-
@kaarin333, the best I can tell is that you are having issues commenting on a website, but I am not entirely certain. if you need assistance with WordPress.com please state your question or issue in a concise manner, and I will be happy to look into it for you.
- The topic ‘www.vindicating michael’ is closed to new replies.
WordPress.com Forums 